EFFECT OF POULTRY LITTER APPLICATION RATE AND MATURITY ON GROWTH COMPONENTS AND NUTRITIONAL VALUE OF SUPER NAPIER GRASS AS RUMINANT FEED

Authors

  • K.J ONALEYE Federal University Wukari image/svg+xml
  • YAKUBU ALIYU
  • A.J. PATRICK
  • P.A. HENRY

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33003/jaat.2026.1201.18

Keywords:

Herbage yield,, crude protein,, harvesting age,, poultry litter,, Super Napier Grass

Abstract

The study was conducted at the Livestock Teaching and Research Farm of the Federal University Wukari, Taraba State, Nigeria, to evaluate the effect of poultry litter application rate and harvesting age on growth components, herbage yield and nutritional value of Super-Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum × Pennisetum americanum). The experiment was a 4 × 4 factorial arranged in a Randomised Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replicates. Four levels of poultry litter (0, 5, 10, and 15 t/ha) and four harvesting ages (45, 60, 75, and 90 days after cutback) were evaluated. Results showed that increasing poultry litter application rate significantly (P<0.05) improved plant height, stand circumference, number of tillers, stem girth, leaf area index, and biomass yield. Plots that received 15 t/ha recorded the highest plant height (272.81 cm) and biomass yield (71.70 t/ha), while the control recorded the lowest (232.53 cm and 29.57 t/ha, respectively). Harvesting at 90 days after cutback produced the tallest plants (297.42 cm) and the highest biomass (60.14 t/ha), but with the lowest crude protein content (6.27% DM) and the highest Lignin fraction (19.71%). The 60-day harvest yielded the highest crude protein (7.32% DM). A significant (P<0.05) interaction effect was observed between application rate and harvesting age for most growth and nutritional parameters. It was concluded that poultry litter at 10 t/ha combined with harvesting at 60 days after cutback optimizes both yield and nutritional quality of Super Napier grass for ruminant feeding in the Nigerian Guinea Savanna zone

References

Adjolohoun, S., Bindelle, J., Adandedjan, C., & Sinsin, B. (2021). Some agronomic and nutritive characteristics of the elephant grass Pennisetum purpureum selected as desirable for smallholder livestock feeding in Benin. Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Société et Environnement, 25(2), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.25518/1780-4507.18743

AOAC. (2019). Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (21st ed.). AOAC International.

Ayub, M., Tanveer, A., Nadeem, M. A., & Husnain, A. (2022). Biomass yield and quality of Napier grass cultivars as influenced by nitrogen application and harvesting intervals. Grass and Forage Science, 77(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12546

Bello, A. O., Afolabi, O. A., & Omojasola, P. F. (2021). Poultry manure application rates and soil fertility enhancement for sustainable forage grass production in the Nigerian Guinea Savanna. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 23(3), 212–224.

Gani, A. T., & Awwal, Y. A. (2025). Assessment of soil degradation and resilience index across different topographic positions in Wukari, Taraba State, Nigeria. Soil and Environment. https://soilenvironment.com/index.php/OSSE/article/view/26

Guo, T., Zhang, Q., Li, S., & Wang, Y. (2023). Organic amendments improve soil fertility and herbage quality of perennial ryegrass: A meta-analysis. Field Crops Research, 294, 108877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2023.108877

Meel, R.K., Sharma, P., and Patel, S. (2025). Impact of fertilization and harvesting interval on nutritive value of Super Napier grass. Journal of forage and Grassland Science, 41 (2), 115-123.

Mwendia, S. W., Njarui, D. M. G., Githinji, J. M., & Muinga, R. W. (2021). Agronomic performance and fodder quality of Super-Napier grass genotypes in semi-arid Kenya. Tropical Grasslands-Forrajes Tropicales, 9(2), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.17138/TGFT(9)78-89

Neumann, M., Leão, G. F. M., Pereira, D. H., & Nussio, L. G. (2022). Yield, morphological composition, and nutritive value of Napier grass hybrids under different cutting managements. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 284, 115200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.115200

SAS Institute. (2019). SAS/STAT User's Guide (Version 9.4). SAS Institute Inc.

Soumya, P. (2011). Evaluation of Promising hybrid Napier Cultivars under Varying Plant Population. Dissertation, College of Horticulture, Vellanikkara, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, India. 73p.

Tessema, Z. K., de Boer, W. F., Baars, R. M. T., & Prins, H. H. T. (2020). Changes in soil nutrients and vegetation characteristics following different rates of organic and inorganic fertiliser application in Ethiopian highland Napier grass. Grass and Forage Science, 75(3), 298–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12485

Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., & Lewis, B. A. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74(10), 3583–3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2

Downloads

Published

2026-06-13

How to Cite

EFFECT OF POULTRY LITTER APPLICATION RATE AND MATURITY ON GROWTH COMPONENTS AND NUTRITIONAL VALUE OF SUPER NAPIER GRASS AS RUMINANT FEED. (2026). FUDMA Journal of Agriculture and Agricultural Technology, 12(1), 155-161. https://doi.org/10.33003/jaat.2026.1201.18

Similar Articles

41-50 of 216

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)