EGG WEIGHT, SHELL THICKNESS AND CHOLESTEROL CONCENTRATION IN SPECIALIZED BREEDS OF EGG-TYPE CHICKENS AS INFLUENCED BY LAYER AGE

Authors

  • H.K YAHAYA
  • A.K. OLUTUNMOGUN
  • E.T. BOLUFAWI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33003/jaat.2023.0904.13

Keywords:

Laying hen,, egg weight,, cholesterol,, shell thickness

Abstract

The effect of breeds on egg quality of egg-type chickens from Plymouth Rock and White Leghorn commercial laying hens was investigated. The aim was to determine the egg weight, cholesterol levels and shell thickness on a commercial poultry farm over twelve weeks. A total of 408 laying hens were evaluated for the two breeds, which commenced from the fifth week into lay for twelve weeks. The birds were aged 24 weeks at the commencement of the study. The biological material consisted of 50 randomly collected eggs per week, and all eggs laid during the study period were weighed. Conventional AOAC methods were used to analyze the eggs. All data were analyzed using the R-core statistical package, and results were presented graphically. The results showed that the White leghorn breed (red, breed 1) had a heavy and significant average egg weight (50-60g) over Plymouth rock (blue, breed 2), which recorded a mean average of 20-37g.  Shell thickness was the same for the two breeds at week 1 (47mm). White leghorn had consistent shell thickness between 49 and 53mm, while the Plymouth rock breed increased from 41 to 50mm. Eggs from the Plymouth rock breed had a cholesterol concentration of 0.57 – 0.65 mmol/L, while the White leghorn breed ranged from 0.51 – 0.55 mmol/L. It can be concluded that since the two breeds performed differently under similar dietary and management conditions, the White leghorn breed influenced better and had higher egg weight and shell thickness, while the nutritive value component from cholesterol was higher in the Plymouth rock.

References

AOAC (1990). Official methods of analysis, 13th ed. Food composition, Additives, Natural contaminants Eggs and eggs products (chapter 24). Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Inc. Arlington, Virginia, USA. 1018 pp.

Biesiada-Drzazga, B. (2009). Estimation of morphological composition and physical traits of hatching eggs in the selected meat hen stocks. Rocz. Nauk. PTZ, 5(1): 35–42.

Biesiada-Drzazga, B. and Janocha, A. (2009). Impact of hen breed and reading system on the quality of eggs for consumption]. Żywn. NaukaTechnol. Jakość, 3(64): 67–74 [in Polish].

Djukic-Stojcic., M., Peric, L., Bjedov, S. and Milosevic, N. (2009). The quality of table eggs produced in different housing systems. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 25(5-6): 1103-1108.

DURD, (2014). Department of Urban and Regional Development. Federal Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development. Case study of Kaduna, Kaduna State.

Elkin, R.G. and Yan, Z. (1999). Relation between inhibition of mevalonate biosynthesis and reduced fertility in layering hens. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 116: 269-275s.

Ingr, I., Simeonova, J. and Stavkova, J. (1987). Cholesterol content in market hen eggs. Nahrung, 31: 933-940.

Krawczyk, J., Sokolowicz, Z. and Scymczyk, B. (2011). Effect of housing system on cholesterol, vitamin and fatty acid content of yolk and physical characteristics of eggs from Polish native hens. Arch. of Poultry, 75(3): 151-157. ISSN 0003-9098.

Lichovnikova, M. and Zeman, L. (2008). Effect of housing system on the calcium requirement of laying hens and on eggshell quality. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 4: 162-168.

Miao, Z.H., Glatz, P.C. and Ru, Y.J. (2005). Free-range poultry production - A review. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science, 18: 113-132.

Oloyo R. A. (2003). Effect of age on total lipid and cholesterol of hen eggs. Indian Journal of Animal Science, 73: 94–96.

Omomijo, A. G. (2014). Rainfall amount and number of rain days in Kaduna, Northern Nigeria-Implication on crop production. International Conference on Agricultural , Ecological and Medical Science (AEMS-2014) July 3-4.

Pauzenga, U. (1985). Feeding parent stock. Zootecnia International, 22-25.

R-Core Team (2013). A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/

Radu-Rusu, R.M., Usturoi, M.G., Leahu, A., Amariei, S., Radu-Rusu, C.G. and Vacaru-Opriş, I. (2014). Chemical features, cholesterol and energy content of table hen eggs from conventional and alternative farming systems. South African Journal of Animal Science, 44 (1): 33-42. URL: http://www.sasas.co.za ISSN 0375-1589 (print), http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v44i1.5

Silversides, F.G. and Scott, T.A. (2001). Effect of storage and layer age on quality of eggs from two lines of hens. Poultry Science, 80: 1240–1245.

Singh, R., Cheng, K.M. and Silversides, F.G. (2009). Production performance and egg quality of four strains of laying hens kept in conventional cages and floor pens. Poultry Science, 88: 256-264.

Sokołowicz, Z., Krawczyk, J., Herbut, E. (2012). Quality of eggs from organically reared laying hens during their first and second year of production. Żywn. Nauka Technol. Jakość, 4(83):185–194 [in Polish].

Usturoi, M. and Radu-Rusu, R.M. (2006). Alternative solutions to be used in laying hens' husbandry, Bullet. Cluj-Napoca University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine, 62: 32-36.

Van den Brand, H., Parmentier, H.K. and Kemp, B. (2004). Effects of housing system (outdoor vs. cages) and age of laying hens on egg characteristics. British Poultry Science, 45: 745–752.

Vorlova, L., Sieglova, E., Karpiskova, R. and Kopriva, V. (2001). Cholesterol content in eggs during the laying period. ACTA VET BRNO, 70: 387-390.

Zemkova, L., Simenova, J., Lichovnikoa, M. and Somerlikova, K. (2007). The effect of housing systems and age of hen on egg weight and cholesterol concentration of egg. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 52(4): 110-115.

Zita, L., Jenıkova, M. and Hartlova, H. (2018). Effect of housing system on egg quality and the concentration of cholesterol in egg yolk and blood of hens of native resources of the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Journal of Apply Poultry Research, 27:380–388. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/japr/pfy009

Downloads

Published

2024-05-31