GROWTH AND FORAGE QUALITY OF NAPIER GRASS AS RUMINANT FEED, INFLUENCED BY POULTRY LITTER APPLICATION RATE AND HARVEST AGE

Authors

  • K. J ONALEYE Federal University Wukari image/svg+xml
  • YAKUBU ALIYU
  • A.J. PATRICK
  • O.C. ADILI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33003/jaat.2026.1201.19

Keywords:

biomass yield,, forage quality,, harvest age,, Napier grass,, poultry litter,, Taraba State

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of poultry litter application rates (0, 5, 10, and 15 tons/ha) and harvest ages (45, 60, 75, and 90 days after cutback, DAC) on the growth parameters, biomass yield, proximate composition, and cell wall fiber fractions of Napier grass. A 4 × 4 factorial experiment was arranged in a split-plot design with three replications at the Livestock Teaching and Research Farm, Federal University Wukari. Poultry litter application rate significantly (p < 0.05) influenced plant height, leaf width, number of tillers, leaf: stem ratio, leaf area index (LAI), and biomass yield, with the highest biomass yield (41.04 tons/ha) recorded at 10 tons/ha. Harvest age significantly affected all measured parameters except leaf: stem ratio and stand circumference. Biomass yield peaked at 75 DAC (38.86 tons/ha), while crude protein (CP) content was highest at 60 DAC (7.85%) and lowest at 75 DAC (4.97%). Fiber fractions increased with maturity. Significant interactions (p < 0.05) between poultry litter and harvest age were observed for most growth and quality parameters. The combination of 15 t/ha poultry litter harvested at 45 DAC produced the highest CP (9.65%), while 10 tons/ha harvested at 75 DAC gave the highest biomass (48.76 tons/ha). Crude protein values across all treatments fell below the 8–12% requirement for goat production, indicating the necessity for protein supplementation. For an optimal balance of biomass yield and forage quality in smallholder goat production systems in Taraba State, poultry litter application at 10 t/ha combined with harvest at 60–75 DAC is recommended

References

Aderinoye-Abdulwahab, S. A. and Oyewale, O. F. (2024). Pastoralists' knowledge of Napier cultivation: Implication for social and environmental security in Nigeria. Scientific African, 24, e02185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02185

Akinfemi, A. and Ogunwole, O. A. (2024). Forage growth biomass, yield and quality responses of three varieties of Napier grass at cutting intervals in the South West Nigeria. Trends in Agricultural Sciences, 3(4), 245–256.

AOAC (1995). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official methods of analysis (16th ed.).

Bardeson, D. (2023, November 20). Elephant grass, also known as Napier grass, is a perennial tropical grass that can grow up to 4 meters tall [LinkedIn post]. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/desmond-dogara-bardeson_elephant-grass-also-known-as-napier-grass-activity-7132644817263546368-tpsl

Dombar, B. Y., Joseph, S. D. and Ngoran, T. (2023). Effect of poultry manure rates on the growth and yield of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) in the derived savanna zone of Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Science and Environment, 23(1), 45–58.

FAO (2012). Food and Agriculture Organization.Peace building: Farmers, pastoralists receive inputs, planting materials for pasture development. FAO Nigeria. https://www.fao.org/nigeria/news/detail-events/zh/c/1440375/

Girgiri, A. Y., Chana, Z. M., Kolo, U. M., Babale, A. I., Bislava, M. B. and Jibrin, T. A. (2024). Effects of poultry manure rates on growth components and forage quality of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) in semi-arid region of Maiduguri, Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and Environment, 21(2), 45–56.

Hyelda, A. J., Gworgwor, Z. A., Yakubu, A. K., Tuwanga, J. V. and Ahmed, A. (2025). Effect of different fertilizers on the chemical and mineral compositions of Napier grass under irrigation system. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production, 52, 1582–1585.

Idris, A., Gumel, I. A. and Santuraki, A. H. (2025). Enhancing sustainable ruminant nutrition through hydroponic maize fodder production. Journal of Animal Production and Environmental Sustainability, 1(4), 43–48.

Meel, B. L., Sharma, S. and Singh, R. (2025). Sampling and analytical techniques for forage quality assessment. Journal of Forage Science, 42(1), 78–92.

Ojo, V. O., Dele, P. A. and Amole, T. A. (2016). Effect of poultry manure application on the growth and nutritive value of Panicum maximum. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production, 43(1), 156–165.

Onaleye, K. J., Amos, N. D. and Yakubu, A. (2026). Effect of inorganic fertilizer application rates and age on morphological characteristics, fresh biomass and chemical composition of Super Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum hybrid) regrowth. Journal of Animal Production and Environmental Sustainability, 2(1), 169–179.

Soumya, P. (2011). Evaluation of Promising hybrid Napier Cultivars under Varying Plant Population. Dissertation, College of Horticulture, Vellanikkara, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, India. 73p.

Van Soest, P. J. (1994). Nutritional ecology of the ruminant (2nd ed.). Cornell University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-13

How to Cite

GROWTH AND FORAGE QUALITY OF NAPIER GRASS AS RUMINANT FEED, INFLUENCED BY POULTRY LITTER APPLICATION RATE AND HARVEST AGE. (2026). FUDMA Journal of Agriculture and Agricultural Technology, 12(1), 162-170. https://doi.org/10.33003/jaat.2026.1201.19

Similar Articles

1-10 of 315

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)